WEKO3
アイテム
Faith, Recognition, and Community : Abraham and “Faith-In” in Hegel and Kierkegaard
https://hokkyodai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000405
https://hokkyodai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000405be2eb0c1-7603-4ca4-8d3d-06827c46c500
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ak-202502-04.docx (72.3 KB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2025-03-07 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | Faith, Recognition, and Community : Abraham and “Faith-In” in Hegel and Kierkegaard | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Hegel | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Philosophy of Religion | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Kierkegaard | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | ヘーゲル | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | 宗教哲学 | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | キルケゴール | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||
| 著者 |
KOMASINSKI, Andrew
× KOMASINSKI, Andrew
|
|||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
| 内容記述 | This article looks at “faith-in” and what Jonathan Kvanvig calls the “belittler objection” by comparing Hegel and Kierkegaard’s interpretations of Abram （later known as Abraham）. I first argue that Hegel’s treatment of Abram in Spirit of Christianity and its Fate is an objection to faith-in. Building on this from additional Hegelian texts, I argue that Hegel’s objection arises from his social command account of morality. I then turn to Johannes de Silentio’s treatments of Abraham in Fear and Trembling and Søren Kierkegaard’s Works of Love to argue that Kierkegaard defends faith-in as part of a moderate divine command account of moral knowledge. Finally, this article concludes that the belittler objection is ultimately an objection to faith-in as a divine command source of moral knowledge or obligation rather than a social command source. | |||||||
| bibliographic_information |
American Catholic philosophical quarterly : journal of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 巻 92, 号 3, p. 445-464, 発行日 2018 |
|||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 10513558 | |||||||
| item_10_source_id_9 | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA10767195 | |||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||
| 出版タイプ | AM | |||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | |||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | The American Catholic Philosophical Association | |||||||
